관리-도구

편집 파일: 1615018923.M395094P2005.server.saraya-global.com,S=10426,W=10648:2,

Envelope-to: jaisone@saraya.com.my
Delivery-date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 16:22:03 +0800
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 00:21:13 -0800
To: <jaisone@saraya.com.my>
Message-ID: <16083875538102216086977713191923@5ni3pxu.lifesmils.guru>
From: "Guardian Angel" <GuardianAngel@lifesmils.guru>
Content-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=Part.181.2030.1615018873"
 
 Content analysis details: (20.0 points, 5.0 required)
 pts rule name description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 1.2 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL
 blocklist
 [URIs: lifesmils.guru]
 1.0 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100%
 [score: 1.0000]
 5.0 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
 [score: 1.0000]
 2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL
 [195.62.46.229 listed in psbl.surriel.com]
 4.5 URIBL_DBL_SPAM Contains a spam URL listed in the Spamhaus DBL
 blocklist
 [URIs: lifesmils.guru]
 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or
 identical to background
 0.8 CPANEL_LOTS_OF_EMPTY_LINE RAW: Spam that has large block of
 empty lines
 2.0 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
 1.0 KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY Sending domain does not have any
 anti-forgery methods
 1.8 NORDNS_LOW_CONTRAST No rDNS + hidden text
X-Spam-Flag: YES
Subject: ***SPAM*** Get your FREE Psychic Reading

------=Part.181.2030.1615018873
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Get your FREE Psychic Reading

If you have problem with view image you can, browse me

http://www.lifesmils.guru/1608-77-697-55381022/jaisone/tindex7.html

http://www.lifesmils.guru/1608-77-697-55381022/jaisone/rindex8.html

rated into Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia passed the mark of two million articles on September 9, 2007, making it the largest encyclopedia ever assembled, surpassing the Yongle Encyclopedia made during the Ming Dynasty in 1408, which had held the record for almost 600 years.[28] Citing fears of commercial advertising and lack of control in Wikipedia, users of the Spanish Wikipedia forked from Wikipedia to create the Enciclopedia Libre in February 2002.[29] Wales then announced that Wikipedia would not display advertisements, and changed Wikipedia's domain from wikipedia.com to wikipedia.org.[30][31] Though the English Wikipedia reached three million articles in August 2009, the growth of the edition, in terms of the numbers of new articles and of contributors, appears to have peaked around early 2007.[32] Around 1,800 articles were added daily to the encyclopedia in 2006; by 2013 that average was roughly 800.[33] A team at the Palo Alto Research Center attributed this slowing of growth to the project's increasing exclusivity and resistance to change.[34] Others suggest that the growth is flattening naturally because articles that could be called "low-hanging fruit"—topics that clearly merit an article—have already been created and built up extensively.[35][36][37] File:Wikipedia Edit 2014.webm A promotional video of the Wikimedia Foundation that encourages viewers to edit Wikipedia, mostly reviewing 2014 via Wikipedia content In November 2009, a researcher at the Rey Juan Carlos University in Madrid found that the English Wikipedia had lost 49,000 editors during the first three months of 2009; in comparison, the project lost only 4,900 editors during the same period in 2008.[38][39] The Wall Street Journal cited the array of rules applied to editing and disputes related to such content among the reasons for this trend.[40] Wales disputed these claims in 2009, denying the decline and questioning the methodology of the study.[41] Two years later, in 2011, Wales acknowledged the presence of a slight decline, noting a decrease from "a little more than 36,000 writers" in June 2010 to 35,800 in June 2011. In the same interview, Wales also claimed the number of editors was "stable and sustainable".[42] A 2013 article titled "The Decline of Wikipedia" in MIT Technology Review questioned this claim. The article revealed that since 2007, Wikip

------=Part.181.2030.1615018873
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"

<html>
<head>
=09<title>Newsletter</title>
</head>
<body >

<div style=3D"position:absolute;top:-1000px;left:-1000px;height:0px;width:0=
px;"><a href=3D"http://www.lifesmils.guru/trRQSAXCSVP/NOUIKLHMV/1608/1319/1=
923/44/55381022/index.htm" style=3D"border=3D0;"><div></div></a></div>

<center>
<div><a href=3D"http://www.lifesmils.guru/1608-77-697-55381022/jais=
one/tindex1.html" style=3D"color:#0033A0; font-size:24px;font-family:calibr=
i;" target=3D"blank" style=3D"width:500px;">Get your FREE Psychic Reading</=
a> 
 
<a href=3D"http://www.lifesmils.guru/1608-77-697-55381022/jaisone/tindex1.h=
tml" target=3D"blank" style=3D"width:500px;"><img src=3D"http://www.lifesmi=
ls.guru/1608-77-697-55381022/i/img077697387.png" alt=3D"If you have problem=
 with view image you can, browse me"/></a> 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
<a href=3D"http://www.lifesmils.guru/1608-77-697-55381022/jaisone/rindex3.h=
tml"><img src=3D"http://www.lifesmils.guru/1608-77-697-55381022/i/img177697=
387.png" /></a> 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
<a href=3D"http://www.lifesmils.guru/1608-77-697-55381022/jaisone/u.html" t=
arget=3D"blank"><img src=3D"http://www.lifesmils.guru/1608-77-697-55381022/=
i/img277697387.jpg" /></a> 
 
 
rated into Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia pas=
sed the mark of two million articles on September 9, 2007, making it the la=
rgest encyclopedia ever assembled, surpassing the Yongle Encyclopedia made =
during the Ming Dynasty in 1408, which had held the record for almost 600 y=
ears.[28]

Citing fears of commercial advertising and lack of control in Wikipedia, us=
ers of the Spanish Wikipedia forked from Wikipedia to create the Encicloped=
ia Libre in February 2002.[29] Wales then announced that Wikipedia would no=
t display advertisements, and changed Wikipedia's domain from wikipedia.com=
 to wikipedia.org.[30][31]

Though the English Wikipedia reached three million articles in August 2009,=
 the growth of the edition, in terms of the numbers of new articles and of =
contributors, appears to have peaked around early 2007.[32] Around 1,800 ar=
ticles were added daily to the encyclopedia in 2006; by 2013 that average w=
as roughly 800.[33] A team at the Palo Alto Research Center attributed this=
 slowing of growth to the project's increasing exclusivity and resistance t=
o change.[34] Others suggest that the growth is flattening naturally becaus=
e articles that could be called "low-hanging fruit"=E2=80=94topics that cle=
arly merit an article=E2=80=94have already been created and built up extens=
ively.[35][36][37]

File:Wikipedia Edit 2014.webm
A promotional video of the Wikimedia Foundation that encourages viewers to =
edit Wikipedia, mostly reviewing 2014 via Wikipedia content
In November 2009, a researcher at the Rey Juan Carlos University in Madrid =
found that the English Wikipedia had lost 49,000 editors during the first t=
hree months of 2009; in comparison, the project lost only 4,900 editors dur=
ing the same period in 2008.[38][39] The Wall Street Journal cited the arra=
y of rules applied to editing and disputes related to such content among th=
e reasons for this trend.[40] Wales disputed these claims in 2009, denying =
the decline and questioning the methodology of the study.[41] Two years lat=
er, in 2011, Wales acknowledged the presence of a slight decline, noting a =
decrease from "a little more than 36,000 writers" in June 2010 to 35,800 in=
 June 2011. In the same interview, Wales also claimed the number of editors=
 was "stable and sustainable".[42] A 2013 article titled "The Decline of Wi=
kipedia" in MIT Technology Review questioned this claim. The article reveal=
ed that since 2007, Wikip
</div>
</center>

</body>
</html>

------=Part.181.2030.1615018873--