관리-도구

편집 파일: 1614775353.M913486P14502.server.saraya-global.com,S=11391,W=11641:2,

Envelope-to: jaisone@saraya.com.my
Delivery-date: Wed, 03 Mar 2021 20:42:33 +0800
To: <jaisone@saraya.com.my>
Message-ID: <15603875538102215606743113001902@dwoptp8l.trendfood.guru>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 04:41:37 -0800
From: "PhysioFit" <PhysioFit@trendfood.guru>
Content-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=Part.969.7982.1614775297"
Subject:  ***SPAM***  The Most Dangerous Food In America?

------=Part.969.7982.1614775297
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

If there’s one food you should avoid completely, THIS is it.

Seriously, it’s as bad as it gets. Nothing is worse.

It can deposit fat directly on your heart, leading to an 87% higher risk of heart attack.
http://www.trendfood.guru/1560-31-674-55381022/jaisone/tindex5.html
It's been linked to certain kinds of tumors.

Even worse, it turns off your master fat loss enzyme, making losing weight all but impossible.

In 1990 it was banned in Europe.

Unfortunately, thanks to corporate greed, it's still 100% legal here in the U.S.A.

THIS is the WORST food you can possibly eat = >>
http://www.trendfood.guru/1560-31-674-55381022/jaisone/tindex6.html

http://www.trendfood.guru/1560-31-674-55381022/jaisone/rindex7.html

trators are not supposed to enjoy any special privilege in decision-making; instead, their powers are mostly limited to making edits that have project-wide effects and thus are disallowed to ordinary editors, and to implement restrictions intended to prevent certain persons from making disruptive edits (such as vandalism).[100][101] Fewer editors become administrators than in years past, in part because the process of vetting potential Wikipedia administrators has become more rigorous.[102] Bureaucrats name new administrators solely upon the recommendations from the community. Dispute resolution Over time, Wikipedia has developed a semi-formal dispute resolution process to assist in such circumstances. To determine community consensus, editors can raise issues at appropriate community forums,[note 6] or seek outside input through third opinion requests or by initiating a more general community discussion known as a "request for comment". Arbitration Committee Main article: Arbitration Committee The Arbitration Committee presides over the ultimate dispute resolution process. Although disputes usually arise from a disagreement between two opposing views on how an article should read, the Arbitration Committee explicitly refuses to directly rule on the specific view that should be adopted. Statistical analyses suggest that the committee ignores the content of disputes and rather focuses on the way disputes are conducted,[103] functioning not so much to resolve disputes and make peace between conflicting editors, but to weed out problematic editors while allowing potentially productive editors back in to participate. Therefore, the committee does not dictate the content of articles, although it sometimes condemns content changes when it deems the new content violates Wikipedia policies (for example, if the new content is considered biased). Its remedies include cautions and probations (used in 63% of cases) and banning editors from articles (43%), subject matters (23%), or Wikipedia (16%). Complete bans from Wikipedia are generally limited to instances of impersonation and anti-social behavior. When conduct is not imperson

------=Part.969.7982.1614775297
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"

If there=E2=80=99s one food you should avoid completely, THIS is it.<br><br=
>

Seriously, it=E2=80=99s as bad as it gets. Nothing is worse. <br><br>

It can deposit fat directly on your heart, leading to an 87% higher risk of=
 heart attack.  <br><br>

It's been linked to certain kinds of tumors. <br><br>

Even worse, it turns off your master fat loss enzyme, making losing weight =
all but impossible.<br><br>

<b><i>In 1990 it was banned in Europe.</i></b><br><br>

Unfortunately, thanks to corporate greed, it's still 100% legal here in the=
 U.S.A.<br><br>

<a href=3D"http://www.trendfood.guru/1560-31-674-55381022/jaisone/tindex1.=
html" target=3D"blank"><b>THIS is the WORST food you can possibly eat =3D >=
></b></a><br><br>

<br><br><br><br><br><br>
<br><br>
<br><br><br>
<br />
<a href=3D"http://www.trendfood.guru/1560-31-674-55381022/jaisone/rindex2.h=
tml" target=3D"blank"><img src=3D"http://www.trendfood.guru/1560-31-674-553=
81022/i/img031674387.png"  /></a><br />
<br /><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>
<br />
<span style=3D"color:#FFFFFF; font-size:3px;">
trators are not supposed to enjoy any special privilege in decision-making;=
 instead, their powers are mostly limited to making edits that have project=
-wide effects and thus are disallowed to ordinary editors, and to implement=
 restrictions intended to prevent certain persons from making disruptive ed=
its (such as vandalism).[100][101]

Fewer editors become administrators than in years past, in part because the=
 process of vetting potential Wikipedia administrators has become more rigo=
rous.[102]

Bureaucrats name new administrators solely upon the recommendations from th=
e community.

Dispute resolution
Over time, Wikipedia has developed a semi-formal dispute resolution process=
 to assist in such circumstances. To determine community consensus, editors=
 can raise issues at appropriate community forums,[note 6] or seek outside =
input through third opinion requests or by initiating a more general commun=
ity discussion known as a "request for comment".

Arbitration Committee
Main article: Arbitration Committee
The Arbitration Committee presides over the ultimate dispute resolution pro=
cess. Although disputes usually arise from a disagreement between two oppos=
ing views on how an article should read, the Arbitration Committee explicit=
ly refuses to directly rule on the specific view that should be adopted. St=
atistical analyses suggest that the committee ignores the content of disput=
es and rather focuses on the way disputes are conducted,[103] functioning n=
ot so much to resolve disputes and make peace between conflicting editors, =
but to weed out problematic editors while allowing potentially productive e=
ditors back in to participate. Therefore, the committee does not dictate th=
e content of articles, although it sometimes condemns content changes when =
it deems the new content violates Wikipedia policies (for example, if the n=
ew content is considered biased). Its remedies include cautions and probati=
ons (used in 63% of cases) and banning editors from articles (43%), subject=
 matters (23%), or Wikipedia (16%). Complete bans from Wikipedia are genera=
lly limited to instances of impersonation and anti-social behavior. When co=
nduct is not imperson
</span>
<br /><br />

</div>

</body>
</html>

------=Part.969.7982.1614775297--