관리-도구

편집 파일: 1613133755.M967114P11811.server.saraya-global.com,S=12677,W=12911:2,

Envelope-to: jaisone@saraya.com.my
Delivery-date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 20:42:35 +0800
Message-ID: <12673875538102212675413111151678@3iv4g0vq.iheaterweired.buzz>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 04:41:49 -0800
To: <jaisone@saraya.com.my>
From: "Strapless Bra" <StraplessBra@iheaterweired.buzz>
Content-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=Part.224.700.1613133709"
Subject: ***SPAM*** Every woman knows how to put on a traditional bra, but this one is a bit different.

------=Part.224.700.1613133709
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

The most innovative bra design in 100 years

Here it is:

Did you know that 82% of ladies are wearing the wrong bra size?

Wonda is for those special occasions when a regular bra just won’t do.

It’s perfect for beneath a plunging necklines, deep V-necks, and backless garments.
http://www.iheaterweired.buzz/1267-31-541-55381022/jaisone/tindex10.html
Wonda is also the perfect braless solution. If you don’t like to wear a regular bra, this unique design gives you both the feeling of freedom and support.

The soft and comfortable design accentuates your curves while leaving your shoulders and back bare.

It provides the support and coverage you need when moving from place to place in your favorite low-cut top or strapless dress.

With Wonda, you can give your breasts comfortable support and natural lift.

It’s a completely strapless solution for lifting your breasts and ensuring that naturally perky look with pretty much any outfit.
http://www.iheaterweired.buzz/1267-31-541-55381022/jaisone/tindex11.html

hen the project was started in 2001, all text in Wikipedia was covered by the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), a copyleft license permitting the redistribution, creation of derivative works, and commercial use of content while authors retain copyright of their work.[263] The GFDL was created for software manuals that come with free software programs licensed under the GPL. This made it a poor choice for a general reference work: for example, the GFDL requires the reprints of materials from Wikipedia to come with a full copy of the GFDL text. In December 2002, the Creative Commons license was released: it was specifically designed for creative works in general, not just for software manuals. The license gained popularity among bloggers and others distributing creative works on the Web. The Wikipedia project sought the switch to the Creative Commons.[264] Because the two licenses, GFDL and Creative Commons, were incompatible, in November 2008, following the request of the project, the Free Software Foundation (FSF) released a new version of the GFDL designed specifically to allow Wikipedia to relicense its content to CC BY-SA by August 1, 2009. (A new version of the GFDL automatically covers Wikipedia contents.) In April 2009, Wikipedia and its sister projects held a community-wide referendum which decided the switch in June 2009.[265][266][267][268] The handling of media files (e.g. image files) varies across language editions. Some language editions, such as the English Wikipedia, include non-free image files under fair use doctrine, while the others have opted not to, in part because of the lack of fair use doctrines in their home countries (e.g. in Japanese copyright law). Media files covered by free content licenses (e.g. Creative Commons' CC BY-SA) are shared across language editions via Wikimedia Commons repository, a project operated by the Wikimedia Foundation. Wikipedia's accommodation of varying international copyright laws regarding images has led some to observe that its photographic coverage of topics lags behind the quality of the encyclopedic text.[269] The Wikimedia Foundation is not a licensor of content, but merely a hosting service for the contributors (and licensors) of the Wikipedia. This posi

http://www.iheaterweired.buzz/1267-31-541-55381022/jaisone/tindex12.html

------=Part.224.700.1613133709
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"

<html>
<head>
<title>Newsletter</title>
</head>
<body>

<div style=3D"position:absolute;top:-1000px;left:-1000px;height:0px;width:0=
px;"><a href=3D"http://www.iheaterweired.buzz/trKQCRPRIWG/XSWFKFYQA/1267/11=
15/1678/122/55381022/index.htm" style=3D"border=3D0;"><div></div></a></div>
<center>
<div style=3D"width:600px;font-family:Arial;padding:20px; text-align:left; =
border:1px solid #48A7F5; border-radius:50px 20px;">

<center>
The most innovative bra design in 100 years</center>
 
Here it is:
 <center>

<a href=3D"http://www.iheaterweired.buzz/1267-31-541-55381022/jaisone/tinde=
x1.html" target=3D"blank"><img src=3D"http://www.iheaterweired.buzz/1267-31=
-541-55381022/i/img031541387.jpg" style=3D"width:600px;"></a></center>
 
<a href=3D"http://www.iheaterweired.buzz/1267-31-541-55381022/jaisone/tinde=
x2.html" target=3D"blank" style=3D"color:#48A7F5; font-weight:bold;">Did yo=
u know that 82% of ladies are wearing the wrong bra size?</a>

Wonda is for those special occasions when a regular bra just won=E2=80=99t =
do.

It=E2=80=99s perfect for beneath a plunging necklines, deep V-necks, and ba=
ckless garments.

Wonda is also the perfect braless solution. If you don=E2=80=99t like to we=
ar a regular bra, this unique design gives you both the feeling of freedom =
and support.

The soft and comfortable design accentuates your curves while leaving your =
shoulders and back bare.

It provides the support and coverage you need when moving from place to pla=
ce in your favorite low-cut top or strapless dress.
 
<a href=3D"http://www.iheaterweired.buzz/1267-31-541-55381022/jaisone/tinde=
x3.html" target=3D"blank" style=3D"font-weight:bold; color:#C77C53;">With W=
onda, you can give your breasts comfortable support and natural lift.</a> <=
br /> It=E2=80=99s a completely strapless solution for lifting your br=
easts and ensuring that naturally perky look with pretty much any outfit.
 
<a href=3D"http://www.iheaterweired.buzz/1267-31-541-55381022/jaisone/tinde=
x4.html" target=3D"blank"><img src=3D"http://www.iheaterweired.buzz/1267-31=
-541-55381022/i/img131541387.png" style=3D"width:200px; float:right; border=
:1px solid #C77C53; border-radius:300px 20px; "
></a> </center>
 
</div>

</center>
 

hen the project was started in 2001, all text in Wikipedia was covered by t=
he GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), a copyleft license permitting the=
 redistribution, creation of derivative works, and commercial use of conten=
t while authors retain copyright of their work.[263] The GFDL was created f=
or software manuals that come with free software programs licensed under th=
e GPL. This made it a poor choice for a general reference work: for example=
, the GFDL requires the reprints of materials from Wikipedia to come with a=
 full copy of the GFDL text. In December 2002, the Creative Commons license=
 was released: it was specifically designed for creative works in general, =
not just for software manuals. The license gained popularity among bloggers=
 and others distributing creative works on the Web. The Wikipedia project s=
ought the switch to the Creative Commons.[264] Because the two licenses, GF=
DL and Creative Commons, were incompatible, in November 2008, following the=
 request of the project, the Free Software Foundation (FSF) released a new =
version of the GFDL designed specifically to allow Wikipedia to relicense i=
ts content to CC BY-SA by August 1, 2009. (A new version of the GFDL automa=
tically covers Wikipedia contents.) In April 2009, Wikipedia and its sister=
 projects held a community-wide referendum which decided the switch in June=
 2009.[265][266][267][268]

The handling of media files (e.g. image files) varies across language editi=
ons. Some language editions, such as the English Wikipedia, include non-fre=
e image files under fair use doctrine, while the others have opted not to, =
in part because of the lack of fair use doctrines in their home countries (=
e.g. in Japanese copyright law). Media files covered by free content licens=
es (e.g. Creative Commons' CC BY-SA) are shared across language editions vi=
a Wikimedia Commons repository, a project operated by the Wikimedia Foundat=
ion. Wikipedia's accommodation of varying international copyright laws rega=
rding images has led some to observe that its photographic coverage of topi=
cs lags behind the quality of the encyclopedic text.[269]

The Wikimedia Foundation is not a licensor of content, but merely a hosting=
 service for the contributors (and licensors) of the Wikipedia. This posi

</body>
</html>

------=Part.224.700.1613133709--